AI and Software in Devices: Key Takeaways from FDA’s Recent Guidance and Initiatives
Artificial intelligence and software-enabled technologies are reshaping medical devices, but they are also breaking the traditional "file, clear, and freeze" regulatory model. FDA has clarified that for AI/ML devices, the future belongs to manufacturers who can master the Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP)—turning regulatory compliance from a barrier into a mechanism for continuous improvement.

The PCCP represents a paradigm shift. It allows a manufacturer to describe, in advance, how an algorithm will evolve, re-train, and update in the post-market phase without triggering a new 510(k) submission for every iteration. The intent is to balance innovation with safety: FDA wants to give "learning" systems the room to improve, but only within strict, pre-validated guardrails.
For manufacturers, this raises the stakes on data quality and documentation. You can no longer just validate the "final" software build; you must validate the process of change. FDA expects you to demonstrate that your data is representative of the real-world population and that you have a robust monitoring system to catch "algorithm drift" before it impacts patient safety. Furthermore, software lifecycle controls are now inextricably linked with cybersecurity; if your AI device is connected, your cyber vulnerabilities are now safety risks.
The Hidden Trap: Registration & Product Codes
While everyone focuses on the PCCP, many manufacturers fail at the basics: Establishment Registration and Device Listing. Choosing the wrong Product Code for an AI-enabled device is a common, costly error. If you list your software under a generic hardware code, or fail to identify as a "Software Manufacturer," you invite questions at the border and confusion during inspections. FDA is creating specific product codes for AI/ML technologies; being in the wrong bucket can delay your market entry.
Translating AI Strategy into Regulatory Action
BRS LLC helps you align your high-tech innovation with FDA's administrative reality:
- Product Code Selection: We analyze your indications and technology to select the precise FDA Product Code (ProCode) that fits your AI/ML claims, ensuring your Device Listing is accurate.
- Pathway Advisory: We help define whether your PCCP strategy requires a De Novo request or fits within a 510(k), avoiding "refuse to accept" decisions.
- Change Control Governance: We support the documentation of your software lifecycle processes, ensuring that post-market updates are tracked and documented in an audit-ready format.
- Cybersecurity Alignment: We ensure your registration data reflects the correct device classification, triggering the right level of cybersecurity scrutiny expectations.
Don't let a "disciplined regulatory story" be the missing piece of your innovation story. Ensure your registration and listing data supports your advanced technology claims.